Are we listening to the same trial?

Awful coverage if you want a fair trial. They praise the prosecutor and judge. Are you sponsored by NCDA? Never ask tough questions to NCDA, Maura Healey, Noble and ALL the taxpayers money wasted on mob attorneys and MSP /DA CORRUPTION. Skipped over the Federal Government investigation in this case

Found this podcast last year with the first trial and found it very useful. The retrial coverage is a totally different podcast. It’s SO biased! I can’t believe their takes. I am now listening to other lawyers on YouTube give their analysis and nobody is thinking the prosecution is doing as well as this podcast is portraying. Weird take to have. And the ads? Ridiculous. This is a hard pass for me

They are covering Karen Read’s re-trial and I can’t see how anyone could have listened to opening arguments and thought the prosecution won that fight. Literally the opposite. They clearly have their beliefs and their “reporting” is skewed.

Half of it is commercials. It almost feels like they are willing to air lower quality content to justify the air time of their commercials.

This was my go to recap pod for this trial last year. Now 1/2 the pod is ads. 11 minutes with 5 minutes of ads? Hard pass. I’ll find another source.

The McAlberts are guilty.

about the o’keefe family and would not…i’ve said MA LE is dirty from the top to the bottom and karen read is not only not guilty, she’s INNOCENT…

The judge can take a partial verdict. If the jury unanimously agrees she is not guilty of 2nd degree murder but can’t decide on the lesser the judge can accept that verdict and in that case 2nd degree is off the table if there is a new trial.

I disagree with the other reviews that it’s biased. They’re just stating the facts. And the facts are that there is a lot of questions. I think it’s helpful to know that this wasn’t recorded specifically as a podcast bc almost every episode has a “we have just a few seconds left” which was annoying and rushed. But other than that I enjoyed it. It was no Unsolved SC: Murdaugh - Murders, Money and Mystery, but engaging and informative.

Good recap of the days events but seems biased with the police and prosecutors.

Good enough Trial recap but the commentary is very irritating. It feels lazy and lacking a true critique and insight into the case.

Great recap of every court date for us who can’t watch them live. However the guest was VERY biased towards the prosecution

At times I’m wondering if the commentators are watching the same trial as I am. The opinions seem rather glossy. The commentators lack the ability to report on apparent untruths that witnesses are testifying. No comment is made when the witnesses change their testimony.